40 results after applying filter
In complete archive
Memorandum to Albert L. Ayars, Superintendent of Norfolk Public Schools, Sam W. Ray, Jr., Deputy Superintendent of Norfolk Public Schools, and Robert M. Forster, Assistant Superintendent, Division of Instruction, Norfolk Public Schools from Gene R. Carter, Director of Secondary Education, Norfolk Public Schools, discusses enrollment figures for the four phases of Norfolk's summer school program.
1976-08-12
Report reviews Norfolk Public School's secondary school enrollment data from September through January, 1974-75, 1975-76, and 1976-77.
1977-03-04
Order in Beckett v. The School Board of the City of Norfolk issued by District Court Judge, John A. MacKenzie, dismissing the case.
1975-02-14
Letter to Albert L. Ayars, Superintendent of Norfolk Public Schools, from Toy D. Savage, Attorney at Law, states that Savage has enclosed a billing statement for services and disbursements for the period January 1, 1974 through February 28, 1975. Fees are for the Beckett v. The School Board case.
1975-02-21
Letter to Allan G. Donn, Attorney at Law, from Henry L. Marsh, Attorney at Law, concerning counsel fees in the Beckett v. the School Board school desegregation case.
1974-08-09
Billing statement to the Norfolk School Board from the law offices of Wilcox, Savage, Lawrence, Dickson & Spindle for the amount of $3, 027.81 for services rendered in the Beckett v. The School Board school desegregation case.
1975-02-21
Letter to Toy D. Savage, Attorney at Law, from Albert L. Ayars, Superintendent of Norfolk Public Schools, states that Ayars has requested the issuance of a check for services and reimbursements incurred by Savage's law office in the Beckett v. The School Board case.
1975-02-27
August 7, 1974 issue of School Law News; primarily focuses on the U. S. Supreme Court's ruling against a metropolitan desegregation plan for the City of Detroit and its suburban counties.
1974-08-07
Letter to E. G. Middleton, Jr., Chairman of the Norfolk School Board, from Allan G. Donn, Attorney at Law, discusses the U.S. District Court's dismissal of Beckett v. The School Board.
1975-02-20
Letter Allan G. Donn, Attorney at Law, from E. George Middleton, Jr., Chairman of the Norfolk School Board, acknowledging receipt of the court order dismissing Beckett v. The Norfolk School Board.
1975-02-24
Memorandum to Members of the Norfolk School from Superintendent Albert L. Ayars concerning the district court's dismissal of the Beckett case.
1975-02-27
Memorandum to Division Superintendents from William H. Cochran, Assistant Superintendent for Administration and Finance, about the state Attorney General's opinion on the revised state Constitution andalso on statutes regarding school financing in the Commonwealth.
1973-02-12
Letter to W. Roy Smith, Member, Virginia House of Delegates, from Andrew P. Miller, Attorney General of Virginia, discusses education Standards of Quality and funding. Miller maintains that the Basic School Aid Formula fails to take into account the current educational practices in the Commonwealth as required by the state Constitution.
1973-02-07
Memorandum to Division Superintendents from William H. Cochran, Assistant Superintendent for Administration and Finance, and Everett B. Howerton, Assistant Superintendent for Administrative Field Services, discusses the Attorney General's opinion regarding the sale of School photographs and other goods to students.
1976-09-27
Letter to Walter E. Campbell, Superintendent of Public Instruction, from Walter H. Ryland, Assistant Attorney General, discusses the Attorney General's opinion regarding the sale of School photographs and other goods to students.
1976-09-24
Letter to the Honorable Mary A. Marshall, Member of the House of Delegates, from Anthony F. Troy, Attorney General of Virginia, concerning salaries of individual school board employees in regard to the Freedom of Information Act.
1977-03-22
Letter to Owen B. Pickett, Member, House of Delegates, from Andrew P. Miller, Attorney General of Virginia, discusses the Attorney General's opinion regarding the sale of school photographs and other goods to students.
1976-09-22
A pro-segregationist booklet written by psychologist, Henry E. Garret, and published by the Patrick Henry Press in Richmond, Virginia.
1965
This report of a conference on "Desegregation without Turmoil" describes the community organization and public information efforts that preceded the implementation of government ordered school integration in cities where this transition was accomplished peacefully. It is the position of the participants in the conference that peaceful desegregation in such communities, e.g., Detroit, Memphis, and Prince George's County, Maryland, could be directly attributed to these efforts. In cities where there was turmoil, the report maintains, the communities themselves were at fault, failing to adequately prepare the parents and children for the desegregation process. The first part of this report describes the forming of coalitions, the participation of various community sectors, and the activities undertaken to facilitate peaceful integration. The second part of the report consists of the conference program schedule, texts of conference speeches by Ben Holman and George Meany, and an extensive list of individual and organizational resources on desegregation.
1976-05-19
Brochure published by the National Conference of Christians and Jews entitled, ""A Unique Program for Combatting Bigotry and Prejudice.""
1976
Brochure published by the National Conference of Christians and Jews entitled, advertising "Brotherhood Week" to be held February 20-27, 1977.
1977
Book marker entitled "Brotherhood, Brotherhood, Brotherhood Begins with Respect," published by the National Conference of Christians and Jews for "Brotherhood Week."
1977
Presented here are the remarks of William Bradford Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division at the Education Commission of the States National Project on Desegregation Strategies' Workshop. Reynolds states that mandatory busing and other remedial techniques to achieve racial balance in schools (measures tentatively sanctioned by the United States Supreme Court after the Swann decision of 1971) have not fared well. The speaker says that the Department of Justice will now emphasize a remedy that will remove State enforced barriers to open up access to public schools; to ensure that all students are provided with educational opportunities of comparable quality; and to provide individual relief to students injured by unconstitutional state actions. Reynolds cites the overseeing of the development of a desegregation plan in Chicago, Illinois in which the Justice Department is emphasizing voluntary desegregation techniques.
1981-12-27
This testimony was delivered by William Bradford Reynolds, the Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division, before the Subcommittee on Separation of Powers, Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate. Reynold states that compulsory busing of students is not an acceptable remedy to achieve racial balance. He emphasizes the responsibility of state and local school boards to formulate educational policies in accordance with Titles IV, VI and IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as well as the Equal Education Opportunity Act of 1974. Reynolds argues for alternative solutions to achieve school desegregation. In developing specific remedial techniques, Reynolds cites the Department of Justice's intent to thoroughly investigate the background of every racially identifiable school in a district to determine whether the racial segregation is de jure or de facto. Reynolds also states that the Department further recognizes several desegregation approaches that seem most promising: voluntary student transfer programs, magnet schools, enhanced curriculum requirements, faculty incentives, in service training programs for teachers and administrators, school closings in systems that are overcrowded, and adjustments to attendance zones.
1981-10-16